https://media.diariolasamericas.com/p/c16eceac5b131c2cae095cc47172f820/adjuntos/216/imagenes/100/263/0100263959/855x0/smart/jose-luis-rodriguez-zapatero-2021-web_afp.jpg
https://media.diariolasamericas.com/p/c16eceac5b131c2cae095cc47172f820/adjuntos/216/imagenes/100/263/0100263959/855x0/smart/jose-luis-rodriguez-zapatero-2021-web_afp.jpg

The Plus Ultra investigation has opened a new line of scrutiny with political and business implications in Bolivia and Peru. A report by Spain’s Economic and Fiscal Crime Unit, known as UDEF, points to former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero over an alleged mediation effort before Bolivian authorities on behalf of Gloria Group, the Peruvian conglomerate that owns Sociedad Boliviana de Cemento, SOBOCE.

Spanish media, referencing the police report, indicate that Zapatero allegedly obtained 200,000 euros through a consultancy deal that investigators believe may have been merely a front. The funds were said to have been funneled via Focus Social Research, a Peruvian firm officially listed as the contracting entity, even though the UDEF asserts that the arrangement was connected to Gloria Group’s commercial dealings.

At the center of the controversy is a major legal dispute in Bolivia. Since 2011, SOBOCE had been involved in litigation with Fábrica Nacional de Cemento, FANCESA, over alleged unfair competition. After years of legal proceedings, Bolivian courts upheld a ruling ordering the cement company linked to Gloria Group to pay 107 million dollars. That decision was later provisionally suspended following a constitutional appeal.

In this context, the UDEF claims that Zapatero used political contacts with senior Bolivian officials, including then-President Luis Arce, cabinet members and figures connected to the economic and judicial spheres. According to the police reconstruction, those efforts included meetings, communications and a trip to Bolivia in September 2024.

The report also highlights Carmen Almendras, previously Bolivia’s ambassador to Spain, as one of the intermediaries involved in the initial outreach. It further notes that Ana María Ospina, Gloria Group’s corporate affairs director, took part in the discussions leading up to the consultancy agreement. According to investigators, messages, schedules and bank transfers were examined as part of the inquiry.

Spanish media have presented the sequence of events — the contacts with Bolivian authorities, the provisional suspension of the ruling against SOBOCE and the later payments — as a central element in the police hypothesis linking the alleged mediation to Gloria Group’s corporate interests. However, the matter remains under judicial examination and no final ruling has established criminal liability.

Zapatero’s circle has denied any wrongdoing and has defended the legality of his professional activities. Meanwhile, the case has triggered political and judicial repercussions in both Spain and Bolivia, where the final decision of the Plurinational Constitutional Tribunal on the dispute between FANCESA and SOBOCE remains pending.

Source: Infobae — ABC